The IQ Paradox Resolved?
Hedging sentence;
1,The consequence of this is that improving childhood IQ does not necessarily mean that children will have high IQ when they are adults.
2,The most important criticism may be that this model lacks enough experimental validation.
3,There really have not been many recent studies done, so the data it is based on is outdated.
4,Though the Dickens-Flynn models posses a very interesting explanation and may be proven as acceptable models in the future,
5, Maybe once they address these problems, they can be accepted in mainstream science as a valid explanation and some day solve the IQ paradox.
6,Now thre needs to be some explanation of definitions so that the Dickens-Flynn models can be best explanation.
7, There are many interesting features that the Dickens n Flynn models allow.
8, The other condition for this is that the environment effect can not accumulate over time.
9,It means that in the future other things regarding environmental change can already be explained statistically.
10, In order to have a child's high IQ last, it is suggested that programs should encourage the continuance of replication of lessons long after they are done with the problem.
11,The criticism against the model is in may parts.
12, There have been several suggestions; Flynn's is just one of them
13, So since the IQ paradox was formed there has been some debate on what affects IQ.
14, The next criticism is that so far, experiments dealing with the Dickens n Flynn model have either had statistical problems or were unable to replicate.
15, The result could also be attributed to other factors, which is the third criticism.
16, Most of the other factors are the long term enviromental effects.
17, Even though the dickens n Flynn models allow for long term environmental effects, there may not be a sgnificant enough allowance for change over time.
18, Whould that person have to start over again to learn how to ride the bike or is the intelligence engraved in their mind?
19, Dickens' and Flynn's models would say the person would have to relearn the skill, which does not seem logical.
20, The last and maybe the most imortant is that the model allows for large changes in IQ variance where historically there is no real change in variance at all.
21, This basically means that at first the correlation between IQ and environment is constant and strong,
22, For the most part, it is universally accepted that there has been a rise i IQ level.
23, The Dickens-Flynn models seem to be one of the most popular explanations thus far but are still a little rocky.
24, From the analysis of the model there really seems to e too many statistical and theoretical blunders made in the development and implementation of the models.
25, As far as that is concerned, long-term environment can be affected by IQ.
26, an example of this is that IQ is known to correlate with socioeconomic status.
27, Even with these blunders these models could be the best explanation of the rise in IQ thus far.
28,If this model was reconsidered with some changes and major experimentd, it may be the best theory to explain the IQ paradox yet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you think the writer uses these hedges?
"to hedge" defines "To avoid a definite decision or commitment" or "to reduce one’s risk of loss on a bet or speculation by compensating transactions on the other side"* He is discussing IQ paradox based on his knowledge. Thus, he is not 100 % sure about his research. He is trying to avoid errors or mistakes on his research. We can use "hedging" depend on how much sure you are about the matter. It also depends on cultural difference. For instance, Japanese prefer using hedging to using assertion. They think it is respectful for others to hedge in their conversation. If a freind invites Japanese freind to his party, Japanese probably try to reply ambigously instead of saying "No", they believe it is their virtue. Is that a virtue??
Reference;
*http://www.bom.gov.au/bmrc/wefor/staff/eee/verif/FAQ-Hedging2.html
1,The consequence of this is that improving childhood IQ does not necessarily mean that children will have high IQ when they are adults.
2,The most important criticism may be that this model lacks enough experimental validation.
3,There really have not been many recent studies done, so the data it is based on is outdated.
4,Though the Dickens-Flynn models posses a very interesting explanation and may be proven as acceptable models in the future,
5, Maybe once they address these problems, they can be accepted in mainstream science as a valid explanation and some day solve the IQ paradox.
6,Now thre needs to be some explanation of definitions so that the Dickens-Flynn models can be best explanation.
7, There are many interesting features that the Dickens n Flynn models allow.
8, The other condition for this is that the environment effect can not accumulate over time.
9,It means that in the future other things regarding environmental change can already be explained statistically.
10, In order to have a child's high IQ last, it is suggested that programs should encourage the continuance of replication of lessons long after they are done with the problem.
11,The criticism against the model is in may parts.
12, There have been several suggestions; Flynn's is just one of them
13, So since the IQ paradox was formed there has been some debate on what affects IQ.
14, The next criticism is that so far, experiments dealing with the Dickens n Flynn model have either had statistical problems or were unable to replicate.
15, The result could also be attributed to other factors, which is the third criticism.
16, Most of the other factors are the long term enviromental effects.
17, Even though the dickens n Flynn models allow for long term environmental effects, there may not be a sgnificant enough allowance for change over time.
18, Whould that person have to start over again to learn how to ride the bike or is the intelligence engraved in their mind?
19, Dickens' and Flynn's models would say the person would have to relearn the skill, which does not seem logical.
20, The last and maybe the most imortant is that the model allows for large changes in IQ variance where historically there is no real change in variance at all.
21, This basically means that at first the correlation between IQ and environment is constant and strong,
22, For the most part, it is universally accepted that there has been a rise i IQ level.
23, The Dickens-Flynn models seem to be one of the most popular explanations thus far but are still a little rocky.
24, From the analysis of the model there really seems to e too many statistical and theoretical blunders made in the development and implementation of the models.
25, As far as that is concerned, long-term environment can be affected by IQ.
26, an example of this is that IQ is known to correlate with socioeconomic status.
27, Even with these blunders these models could be the best explanation of the rise in IQ thus far.
28,If this model was reconsidered with some changes and major experimentd, it may be the best theory to explain the IQ paradox yet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you think the writer uses these hedges?
"to hedge" defines "To avoid a definite decision or commitment" or "to reduce one’s risk of loss on a bet or speculation by compensating transactions on the other side"* He is discussing IQ paradox based on his knowledge. Thus, he is not 100 % sure about his research. He is trying to avoid errors or mistakes on his research. We can use "hedging" depend on how much sure you are about the matter. It also depends on cultural difference. For instance, Japanese prefer using hedging to using assertion. They think it is respectful for others to hedge in their conversation. If a freind invites Japanese freind to his party, Japanese probably try to reply ambigously instead of saying "No", they believe it is their virtue. Is that a virtue??
Reference;
*http://www.bom.gov.au/bmrc/wefor/staff/eee/verif/FAQ-Hedging2.html
posted by youjim @ 9:40 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home